Mud Coffee in First Park

Mud Coffee is one of those local companies that “East Villagers” love to love. They started by selling coffee from a bright orange truck in Astor Place, then they opened up a café on East 9th Street, and most recently took over the gazebo in First Park (at First Avenue and East 1st Street), once occupied by Veselka.

Regular readers of Quilas* will know my position on privatization of public spaces: I don’t think any company should operate in any park, nor should park conservancies have domain over them. That said, Mud operates the gazebo in First Park.

They weren’t there for very long before they hung this sign, on the south side of the park:

first-park-0

It wasn’t up for very long before it was removed, either by the Parks Department or the Mud people at the behest of the Parks Department. I’m pretty sure they wouldn’t have done it of their own volition.

Fast forward to November, 2014, and these appeared:

first-park-1
Northeast corner.

first-park-2
Southwest corner.

first-park-3
South side, at F-train entrance.

first-park-4
Southeast corner.

Responsible citizen that I am, I filed a complaint with 311. With some complaints, you can upload photos, and this was one of those. I uploaded three of the photos; a few weeks later, the signs were down.

_MG_5165
Free of obnoxious signs.

These people have shown no regard for the public nature of this park, so I’m sure they’ll try something again.

* * *

One of the buzzwords of the “East Village” is “community”. Small businesses like Mud are considered part of this “community”, but what type of community member actively tries to destroy that community? The answer, as I’ve written before, is that “community” is not a group that includes everyone — it’s small-business owners and their customers. The Mud owners would take over the park entirely if given the opportunity. It’s already been alleged that they close the park early:

mud-park-20140825-1257

I’m glad to see I’m not the only one who cares about these things.

=-=-=-=-=

*As regular as that can be, given my infrequent posting!

Advertisements

If You Are in New York City, Join Me to Discuss “Reform” on September 11

***

This should be of interest to readers of Quilas.

Diane Ravitch's blog

I will be discussing my new book, “Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America’s Public Schools” at Judson Memorial Church, near New York University, on September 11 at 6 pm.

The event is sponsored by Class Size Matters and New Yorkers for Great Public Schools

Wednesday, Sept.11th

6-7:15 PM at Judson Memorial Church

55 Washington Square South, Manhattan

Trains: A, B, C, D, E, F, M to W 4th St.

N, R to 8 St.; #6 to Astor Place; #1 to Sheridan Sq.

New Yorkers are ready for a new direction for public education, and as the whole country watches our mayoral election, Ravitch will discuss how we can move away from failed policies of the past and towards a successful school system that will work for every student. A question and answer session will follow.

  

 

 

 

 

View original post 11 more words

Defending Neighborhoods

When people say they’re defending their neighborhood, what exactly are they defending, apart from what currently exists? Generally, people defending their neighborhoods are people who cannot afford to move somewhere else. All over the world, people are defending their neighborhoods, whether they use that word or not. Most probably say they’re defending their homes, or their communities.

Neighborhoods these days are “commodities”. (I use quotes because, of course, they’re not real commodities; they’re not reproducible.) They’re delimited (packaged), they’re given names (Nolita, East Village), and they’re marketed to people as life-style choices (oftentimes leading to confusion among those who oppose gentrification). And as something new, they’re being sold to newcomers, not to the people already living there. Newcomers with the requisite cash, that is.

Quality of urban life has become a commodity, as has the city itself, in a world where consumerism, tourism, cultural and knowledge-based industries have become major aspects of the urban political economy. The postmodernist penchant for encouraging the formation of market niches—in both consumer habits and cultural forms—surrounds the contemporary urban experience with an aura of freedom of choice, provided you have the money. Shopping malls, multiplexes and box stores proliferate, as do fast-food and artisanal market-places. … Even the incoherent, bland and monotonous suburban tract development that continues to dominate in many areas now gets its antidote in a ‘new urbanism’ movement that touts the sale of community and boutique lifestyles to fulfill urban dreams.*

We need to go beyond simply defending what exists vs. something worse (displacement, privatization). Defending our neighborhoods means deciding what the neighborhood should be, not just what the storefronts should look like. More people live in cities every year, as the distinction between urban and rural diminishes. We’re all bound up in this. We can’t just be shuffled from slum to slum.

Between 2011 and 2050, the world population is expected to increase by 2.3 billion, passing from 7.0 billion to 9.3 billion (United Nations, 2011). At the same time, the population living in urban areas is projected to gain 2.6 billion, passing from 3.6 billion in 2011 to 6.3 billion 2050. Thus, the urban areas of the world are expected to absorb all the population growth expected over the next four decades while at the same time drawing in some of the rural population. As a result, the world rural population is projected to start decreasing in about a decade and there will likely be 0.3 billion fewer rural inhabitants in 2050 than today.**

So just as I’m writing this, I discovered that the New York City Housing Authority has a plan to lease playgrounds and community centers on public housing property for luxury high-rises! David Harvey:

We increasingly live in divided and conflict-prone urban areas. In the past three decades, the neoliberal turn has restored class power to rich elites. … The results are indelibly etched on the spatial forms of our cities, which increasingly consist of fortified fragments, gated communities and privatized public spaces kept under constant surveillance.*

=-=-=-=-=

* David Harvey, “The Right to the City”, New Left Review, 53 (Sept./Oct. 2008),
5 February, 2013.

** World Urbanization Prospects: The 2011 Revision, United Nations, 2011,
5 February, 2013.